|
home
> clinical research
> article summary
Endovascular and Surgical Treatment of Unruptured
Cerebral Aneurysms: Comparison of Risks
Johnston SC, et.al.
Ann Neurology. 2000; 48:11-19
OBJECTIVE:
To compare risks of neurosurgical clipping and endovascular
coil treatment in the treatment of unruptured cerebral
aneurysms in patients whose aneurysms were judged to
be treatable by both options.
METHODS:
A blinded retrospective study compared surgical clipping
and endovascular treatment of 130 unruptured cerebral
aneurysms at the University of California San Francisco
Hospital. Neurosurgeons and neurointerventional radiologists
were given patient age, past medical history, symptoms,
and signs on presentation based on medical records abstraction
and preprocedural radiographic images.
| RESULTS: |
Surgical
(n=68)
|
Coiled
(n=62)
|
| Change in Rankin
Score of greater than or equal to 2 |
25%
|
8%
|
| Length of Hospital
Stay (days) |
7.7
|
5.0
|
| Hospital Charges |
$38,000
|
$33,400
|
New Symptoms/Disability
at follow-up (mean 3.9 yrs)
|
34%
|
8%
|
| Recovery Time |
1 year
|
27 days
|
CONCLUSION:
Endovascular coil treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms
seems to be associated with significantly fewer complications
and shorter recovery time than surgical clipping.
|